Chopin for Intermediate Players: Where to Start

For ages, I thought Chopin was for other people.

You know the ones — people who started piano at four, worked through all their grades, went to proper music school. Not adult learners who picked up a secondhand upright in their thirties and teach themselves at 11pm after the kid has finally gone to sleep.

I’d sit at the piano, work through whatever I was practising, and then I’d hear someone play a Nocturne on the radio and think: that is not even the same instrument. Whatever they’re doing with their hands, I’m not doing it. Chopin is not for me.

Right. Well. I was wrong about that.

Not the Nocturne in E flat — I’m not delusional. But Chopin’s catalogue is enormous, and quite a bit of it is genuinely accessible to adult intermediate players if you know where to start. Which is what this post is for.

I’m going to walk you through the pieces I’d recommend for adult learners, roughly in order of difficulty, from ‘you could get through this in a term’ to ‘set aside six months and a lot of patience’. I’ll tell you what makes each one worth learning, what’s actually tricky, and what to watch for. A few I’ve played myself. A few I’m still working towards.

There’s also a section on pieces to avoid for now, a bit about the techniques Chopin specifically demands, and some thoughts on editions and listening. Grab a cuppa.

What Makes Chopin, Chopin

Frédéric Chopin wrote almost exclusively for solo piano, which is either brilliant luck or extremely convenient for us, depending on how you look at it. He spent his whole composing life thinking about what the piano could do — how it could sing, how it could breathe, how it could make a room full of people feel something enormous.

A few things that define his writing, which are worth knowing before you start:

• It’s shaped for human hands. Chopin had unusually long, flexible fingers and wrote music that suited them — but also music that fits the natural arc of the hand in a way a lot of Baroque and Classical composers didn’t. The hand positions often feel right once you find them.
• It sings. More than almost any other composer, Chopin writes melodies that breathe like voices. The right-hand line has to have weight and warmth behind it. This is both what makes it beautiful and what makes it genuinely hard to play convincingly.
• The rhythm breathes. He invented — or at least popularised — rubato: the idea that the tempo can flex, that you can linger on a note that matters, rush forward when emotion calls for it. For adult learners this is both a relief (you don’t have to be metronomic) and a skill to develop carefully.
• The left hand is more complicated than it looks. Even in the simpler pieces, Chopin’s bass lines and accompaniment patterns require real independence between the hands. This catches people out more often than the right-hand melody does.

For adult learners specifically, Chopin tends to work well because the music is emotionally direct in a way that matches how we actually experience music. We’re mostly not playing for exams. We play because music means something to us. And Chopin is absolutely drenched in meaning.

Early Intermediate Pieces (Roughly Grade 4–5)

These are the pieces for adult learners who are past the complete beginner stage — you can read music reliably, your hands work somewhat independently, and you’re not panicking at the sight of a few accidentals — but you’re not yet tackling a full Nocturne or a Ballade.

Prelude in E Minor, Op. 28 No. 4

This is the one that changed things for me, so I’m going to spend a bit more time on it than the others.

I’d been playing for about two years when I first tried this. I’d been avoiding it because ‘Chopin’ felt above my level, full stop. But I kept coming back to listen to it — it’s only two pages, it’s slow, it’s in E minor, and the right hand is basically one sustained melody note at a time. So I thought: fine, let’s see what happens.

The left hand is what gets you. It’s a repeating pattern of broken chords — mostly just two notes at a time — but the harmony shifts constantly underneath, and you need to feel those shifts rather than just play them. The first run-through was fine. It was correct. It was completely flat and entirely not music.

The second week, something clicked. I started thinking of the right hand as a voice, something that had weight and intention behind it, and the left hand as breathing underneath. I played it through and thought: oh. That’s what it’s supposed to do. That’s the thing.

I was quite pathetically pleased with myself. I’m not going to pretend otherwise.

Anyway. The E minor Prelude is brilliant for adult learners because it demands expression from the very first bar. You can’t hide behind speed or technique. There is no speed. There is no flashiness. It’s just you, the melody, and whether you can make it sing.

What to watch: Count carefully through the sustained right-hand notes. It’s easy to rush. The ending gradually reduces to almost nothing — don’t let it deflate suddenly, let it dissolve. The final chord is surprisingly affecting if you resist the urge to rush past it.

Grade equivalent: ABRSM Grade 5 area. The technical demands are modest; the expressive demands are considerable.

Prelude in B Minor, Op. 28 No. 6

Often overlooked in favour of its more famous neighbours in the Op. 28 set, but it’s gorgeous and very much doable. The unusual thing about this one: the melody is in the left hand. A lovely, melancholy tune in the bass, while the right hand plays a murmuring accompanying figure above it.

It’s short, slow, and the main technical challenge is voicing — bringing out the left-hand melody without making the right hand vanish entirely. It’s a good exercise in hand independence and in not treating the bass as an afterthought, which is something Chopin will keep asking of you.

What to watch: The right-hand figure needs to be controlled but not robotic. Don’t let it dominate. The left hand is the voice here — that’s the opposite of what most of us are used to, and it takes adjustment.

Prelude in A Major, Op. 28 No. 7

If the E minor is wistful and the B minor is melancholy, the A major is a little ray of something lighter. It’s the shortest piece in the whole Op. 28 set — 16 bars, maybe 90 seconds at the right tempo — and technically one of the most approachable of the lot.

It has a mazurka feel, with a dotted rhythm in the right hand and a simple bass in the left. The challenge is getting the phrasing right and not ironing out the dotted notes. It’s a lovely thing to add to a practice session when you want to feel like you can actually play Chopin.

What to watch: The dotted rhythm is characteristic of the mazurka — don’t make it mechanical. It should have a slight lilt, a little bounce. If it starts to sound stiff, slow down and listen.

Waltz in A Minor, B.150 (Posthumous)

Published after Chopin’s death, and probably his most-played piece at early intermediate level. You’ve almost certainly heard it. It turns up on loads of ‘easy Chopin’ playlists, it’s around ABRSM Grade 5, and it’s genuinely lovely.

The structure is clear, the right-hand melody is singable, and the left-hand waltz pattern (bass note, chord, chord) becomes fairly automatic once you’ve put a few hours in. The piece builds to a slightly more dramatic middle section before returning to the opening theme.

Fair warning, though: because this waltz is so popular and so often played badly, it’s easy to hear a dodgy version and think ‘that doesn’t sound very hard’ and then not take it seriously. It’s not hard in a technical sense. But to play it well — with proper phrasing, with the waltz rhythm feeling natural rather than clunky, with the middle section having genuine weight to it — takes more work than people give it credit for.

What to watch: The left-hand waltz pattern can sound clompy if you’re not careful. Bass note on the beat, then the two chord notes lighter and higher. Both hands breathing together. It should feel like dancing, not marching.

Mid Intermediate Pieces (Roughly Grade 5–7)

These assume you’re reasonably comfortable with the early intermediate pieces — you’ve got decent hand independence, you can navigate richer harmonies, and you’ve started developing some of the expressive control Chopin demands. They’ll take longer and push you more. Worth it.

Prelude in C Minor, Op. 28 No. 20

Known to a lot of people as ‘the one Vanilla Ice sampled’ — yes, Ice Ice Baby, that bass line, really — but don’t let that put you off. It’s 13 bars long, majestic, slow, and built on enormous chords that move like a processional. It lasts barely a minute.

Both hands play chords throughout. The challenge is weight and voicing: the top note of each right-hand chord needs to ring out above the rest, and the whole thing should feel like it has gravity without being heavy-footed. The diminuendo at the end — going from fff to pp in the space of a few bars — is one of those moments that, when it works, is properly satisfying.

What to watch: Don’t let the chords clump. Lead with the top voice in the right hand, listen to the bass notes, and resist the urge to play louder than necessary. This is a piece about sound quality as much as anything.

Nocturne in E Minor, Op. 72 No. 1 (Posthumous)

This is the piece I’d recommend to anyone who says ‘I want to play a Nocturne but I know I’m not ready for Op. 9 No. 2.’ It’s genuinely accessible at this level, it’s beautiful, and it’ll teach you loads about singing tone and phrasing — the things that define Chopin’s style.

The right hand has a flowing, lyrical melody with some gentle ornamentation. The left hand plays a broken-chord accompaniment. The harmony is Chopin at his most rich and chromatic, and working through it is a proper education in how his harmonic language functions. It’s not a shortcut Nocturne. It’s the real thing.

What to watch: The ornaments don’t need to be lightning-fast. They should enhance the melody, not interrupt it. Practise them slowly and make sure they flow before you try them at tempo. The left hand needs to be quiet and consistent — it’s the bed the melody lies on.

Waltz in C# Minor, Op. 64 No. 2

One of Chopin’s most beloved waltzes, and one that rewards the work you put in. It has a slightly wistful, bittersweet quality — a bit like dancing alone in an empty room at dusk, which sounds melancholy but is, in the best way, quite freeing as a musical experience.

The right hand has two contrasting themes: a flowing, sweeping opening section and a slightly more animated middle section before the return. The left hand waltz pattern here needs more nuance than the A minor waltz — the harmonies are richer and the balance between bass note and chords matters more. It’ll take longer to settle into than it looks.

What to watch: The tempo should breathe. The opening section invites rubato — a slightly longing, pulling quality is part of what makes it. Don’t play it stiffly. But don’t use rubato as an excuse to lose the underlying pulse entirely, either. Those two things need to coexist.

Mazurka in F Major, Op. 68 No. 3 (Posthumous)

Mazurkas are Chopin’s most personal pieces — Polish dance forms he wrote throughout his life, often for himself rather than for public performance. This one is posthumous, relatively compact, and has that slightly bittersweet mazurka quality that makes you feel like you’re briefly somewhere else.

It’s a good introduction to the mazurka rhythm, which is different from the waltz: the accent falls on the second or third beat rather than the first, giving it a characteristic lilt. Takes a bit of getting used to if you’ve mostly been playing pieces with a straightforward downbeat. Worth the adjustment.

What to watch: The mazurka rhythm needs to feel natural, not counted. Listen to a few recordings first and let the pulse get into your ear before you start playing. It’s a feel thing more than a counting thing — which is hard to explain, but you’ll know when you have it.

Prelude in D Flat Major, Op. 28 No. 15 (‘Raindrop’)

The most ambitious piece on this list, and the one that’ll take the longest. The Raindrop Prelude is about five minutes long and has three distinct sections: a calm, singing opening in D flat major, a dramatic and turbulent middle section in C# minor (enharmonically the same key, which is very clever), and a return to the opening material.

The ‘raindrop’ nickname comes from the single repeated note — A flat, or G# in the middle section — that runs throughout the entire piece. It’s not technically demanding, that note, but keeping it consistent while everything around it changes takes real concentration.

The middle section is a proper workout. Big chords, dramatic dynamics, a more complex texture. It’s where a lot of people get lost on first attempt. Work it in sections rather than playing through from the start every time — you’ll make faster progress.

What to watch: That repeated note needs to stay quiet in the calm sections. It’s easy to make it too prominent because you’re thinking about it so much. In the opening, it should be almost subliminal. In the middle section it comes to the foreground — that contrast is the whole point.

Essential Techniques — The Chopin Stuff Nobody Warns You About

You can learn all the notes in a Chopin piece and still have it sound wrong. I know this from experience. There are a few things specific to his style that you have to consciously develop, and which no one really explains when you start.

Rubato

Rubato literally means ‘robbed time’ — you take time from some notes and give it to others. In Chopin, it means the melody can breathe, hesitate, rush forward, linger. The pulse underneath doesn’t disappear — the left hand often keeps steady — but the right hand isn’t slave to it.

The way I think about it: the left hand is the clock. The right hand is a person talking. The person can speed up when they’re excited, slow down for emphasis, pause for effect. But they’re still aware of time passing underneath them.

Don’t overdo it. That’s the other thing nobody tells you. Too much rubato is as bad as none — it sounds self-indulgent and loses the listener. Listen to good recordings and notice how subtle it often is. Less than you’d think.

Arm Weight and Singing Tone

Chopin’s melodies need to sing, and that singing quality comes from arm weight rather than finger pressure. You’re not pressing down harder for a louder sound — you’re dropping the weight of your arm through the finger into the key.

This sounds a bit mystical when you first read it. It felt completely abstract to me until I understood the difference physically: playing with tense, stiff arms versus playing with relaxed, heavy arms. The sound is genuinely different. With arm weight, there’s warmth to it. Without it, there’s a thinness.

Practical upshot: keep your shoulders and upper arms relaxed. Don’t grip. Let gravity do some of the work.

The Left Hand Is Not Just Accompaniment

In a lot of music, the left hand is background. In Chopin, the left hand is often having a whole separate conversation with the right. The bass notes shape the harmony, the accompanying figures create texture, and the balance between the two hands is crucial.

A useful exercise: play any Chopin piece hands separately and give the left hand the same attention you’d give a melody. Does it have a shape? Does it breathe? Does it lead somewhere? If the answer is no, you haven’t really listened to it yet.

Proper Chopin practice involves the left hand getting proper practice. Not just as something to get out of the way before the interesting stuff.

Pieces to Avoid (For Now)

A few pieces that come up constantly in beginner-adjacent conversations and that are either genuinely harder than they appear, overplayed badly, or both. No judgement if you’re already working on them — but go in with realistic expectations.

Fantasie Impromptu, Op. 66

Listen. I know. It sounds incredible and everybody wants to play it. But the right hand plays groups of four notes against the left hand playing groups of three, simultaneously, at speed, for most of the piece. This is polyrhythm and it is not easy. I’ve been at the piano for several years and I would not attempt this yet, not if I want to actually play it properly.

People learn it, obviously — I’ve heard it played badly at multiple recitals and seen approximately four thousand videos of it being fumbled through on YouTube. Playing it through and playing it well are two entirely different things. Put it on the someday list.

Ballade No. 1 in G Minor

A masterpiece. Genuinely one of the greatest pieces of piano music ever written. Also: ten minutes long, technically demanding throughout, and requires sustained physical and emotional energy over its full arc that most intermediate players aren’t yet equipped to maintain. It’s not that any single bar is impossible — it’s the sustained complexity across the whole piece. Save it.

The ‘Minute’ Waltz, Op. 64 No. 1

Here’s the thing about the Minute Waltz: at a proper performance tempo, it’s genuinely difficult. Fast, technically demanding, with a right-hand figuration that needs real fluency to not sound like someone having a mild panic attack. The version most people attempt is slower than intended and sounds laboured as a result.

If you want a waltz, start with the A minor or the C# minor. Come back to this one when your technique has developed a bit more. It’ll be more satisfying that way, I promise.

Revolutionary Etude, Op. 10 No. 12

An étude is literally a study in technique. Chopin’s études are technically ferocious and emotionally dramatic and they are not for the faint-hearted. The Revolutionary has relentless left-hand semiquaver passages for its entire duration. It will make your forearm hurt just thinking about it. Not for now.

Common Mistakes Adult Learners Make with Chopin

Playing Too Fast, Too Soon

This is the big one. Chopin sounds beautiful when played with expression and control at a moderate tempo. It sounds genuinely terrible when played at roughly the right speed without control. We hear recordings and want that speed, but the speed is the last thing to arrive — after the notes, the fingering, the voicing, the phrasing, the rubato.

I have made more progress on every Chopin piece I’ve worked on by playing it slower than I wanted to for longer than I wanted to. It is boring. It works every time.

Treating Rubato as ‘Playing Freely’

Rubato is not an excuse to play whenever you feel like it with no rhythmic intention. I used to think ‘free tempo’ meant I didn’t really need to count. This is wrong and sounds awful. Rubato requires you to know the rhythm so well that you can flex it deliberately and tastefully. You can’t rob time you don’t have.

Ignoring the Left Hand in Practice

If you only ever run a Chopin piece hands together from the start, the left hand stays underdeveloped and the piece never feels stable. Practise the left hand alone. Give it the same musical thought you give the right — does it have a shape, does it breathe, does it go somewhere? It should.

Skipping the Simpler Pieces to Get to the Famous Ones

There’s a path through Chopin and it exists for good reason. The Preludes in particular teach you what his harmonic language sounds like, how his textures work, how much expression you need to bring. Starting with a Nocturne in B flat minor without that foundation is a bit like trying to cook something from a Michelin-starred menu before you can make a decent omelette. The simpler pieces aren’t lesser. They’re the foundation.

Building Your Chopin Repertoire

If I were starting from scratch and working through Chopin with some intention, here’s roughly how I’d sequence things:

Start with the E minor and A major Preludes. They’re short, they’re beautiful, and they teach you a lot about voicing and expression quickly. Add the A minor Waltz once you’ve got those under your fingers — it makes a nice contrast in character.

From there, the B minor Prelude and the C minor Prelude make a natural pair: both teach you about sustained, weighted playing from opposite sides of the keyboard. The E minor Nocturne is the next significant step, and if you can play that convincingly, you’re ready to think about the Raindrop Prelude.

The C# minor Waltz and the F major Mazurka can slot in at any point once you’re comfortable with mid-intermediate territory — they’re different enough in character that they’ll add variety rather than overlap.

Don’t try to work on all of them at the same time. Two pieces at a time, really learning them, is worth more than six pieces you can sort of stumble through.

Which Edition Should You Use?

This matters more than people think. Not all Chopin editions are equal — some add fingering and dynamics that weren’t Chopin’s, and some are based on different manuscript sources. The edition shapes what you think the piece is.

For intermediate players, I’d recommend either the Henle Urtext or the Peters edition. Both are based on careful scholarship, clearly printed, and available at a reasonable price. Henle editions often include fingering suggestions, which are clearly marked as editorial additions rather than Chopin’s own, so you can tell the difference.

Avoid cheap editions of uncertain provenance — there are some floating around online and in budget shops that have odd fingering, errors, or added dynamics that Chopin never wrote. A proper Henle edition is around £10–15. Worth it.

What to Listen To

Listening to recordings of the pieces you’re learning is genuinely one of the most useful things you can do. It gives you a map of where you’re trying to go, helps you understand the phrasing, and reminds you what’s possible. I do it far less than I should and it always helps when I actually do it.

A few pianists whose Chopin I love:

• Vladimir Ashkenazy — clear, warm, technically superb without being cold. Good for understanding structure and phrasing.
• Martha Argerich — fiery and urgent, especially in the Preludes. Not always the most conventional interpretations but always alive in a way that wakes you up.
• Krystian Zimerman — probably my favourite for the Nocturnes. The tone quality is extraordinary. Slow but never heavy.
• Ingrid Fliter — particularly worth listening to as an adult learner because her interpretations are expressive without being mannered. She plays the music, not herself.

Don’t limit yourself to one recording. Listen to three or four different pianists play the same piece and notice what’s different. You’ll learn a lot about where the interpretive decisions actually live.

Final Thoughts

Chopin is, I think, one of the most rewarding composers to study as an adult learner — precisely because his music is so emotionally direct. You don’t need to understand it academically before you can feel it. You feel it first, and the understanding follows.

The E minor Prelude still gets me, honestly. It’s technically one of the simpler pieces I play, and it’s the one I keep coming back to when I’ve had a difficult day and I just want to sit at the piano and feel something.

That’s not a small thing. That’s kind of the whole point.

Anyway — if you’re just starting out with Chopin, I hope this helps you find a sensible way in without immediately throwing yourself at a Ballade before you’re ready. Start small, play slowly, listen loads, and give yourself permission to be moved by the simpler pieces. They’re not stepping stones to the ‘real’ Chopin. They are the real Chopin.

I’d love to know where you are with him — are you just starting out, or have you got a few pieces under your belt already? Drop a comment below and let me know what you’re working on. And if there’s a piece that’s given you grief that I haven’t mentioned, I’m very curious to hear about it.

---

Related Posts:

• Romantic Era Piano Pieces for Intermediate Players
• Bach for Adult Piano Learners: Where to Start
• Beethoven’s Easier Pieces: A Learning Path
• Jazz Standards for Classical Piano Players